![]() Only 1.64% of votes landed at 2 stars or worse, and no other match on the card came close to such a low percentage in this category. One thing that greatly helped Neville’s AVG was the extreme lack of votes on the bottom end of the scale. This result puts it within range of last month’s Elimination Chamber match, which scored an AVG of 4.25 stars. Neville’s match with Jack Gallagher greatly impressed the community with an AVG of 4.18 stars. Goldberg’s squash match at Survivor Series 2016 was much better received than this one, with 48.25% of those votes coming in at 4 stars or more, just 12.36% of votes for 0 stars, and an AVG of 3.09 stars. The overall result was a pathetic AVG of 1.06 stars. The Q3 value for this match was lower than the Q1 values for the other 9 matches at Fastlane. Owens and Goldberg bombed with the voters, with 43.68% of the votes coming in at 0 stars and only 18.91% of the votes higher than 2 stars. ![]() Not surprisingly, these two facts taken together means that Bayley’s match had the highest percentage (64.56%) of votes between 2.25 to 3.75 stars among these 5 matches. Bayley’s match also had the lowest percentage (11.65%) of votes for 4 stars or more among this group of 5 matches, with the other matches ranging between 15.45% to 24.06% in that category. The other 4 matches in this group ranged between 27.64% to 34.10% in that category. Within that group of 5 matches, Bayley’s match had the lowest percentage of votes (23.79%) for 2 stars or less, and that’s why the bottom of her blue box isn’t as low as the others. This kind of difference matters when it comes to determining their rankings among such a narrow range of AVG values. Cesaro and Sasha had a higher percentage of 5-star votes than those other matches, with Cesaro and Sasha hovering around the 8.5% to 10.5% range in that category while the others ranged from 2.43% to 6.93%. Cesaro and Sasha had a higher Q3 value than the others in that group (this can be seen via the slightly higher tops of their respective blue boxes compared to Big Show, Gallows, and Bayley). The matches are displayed left to right, sorted by AVG in descending order:ĥ of the 10 matches on this card had a community AVG ranging from 2.72 to 2.83 stars. The thin line above the blue rectangle shows where roughly the highest 25% of the votes were cast, and the thin blue line below the rectangle shows where roughly the lowest 25% of the votes were cast. In most cases the blue rectangle includes the values where roughly the middle 50% of the votes were cast for that match. For any given match, the bottom of the blue rectangle is Q1 and the top of the blue rectangle is Q3. Here is a graphical summary of some of the numbers from the table. The following sortable table includes all the results of the Cageside Community Star Ratings for Fastlane 2017. 0-stars: The percentage of votes for 0 stars.2-stars or less: The percentage of votes that did not surpass 2 stars.2.25 to 3.75 stars: The percentage of votes for more than 2 stars but less than 4 stars.4-stars or more: The percentage of votes for at least 4 stars.5-stars: The percentage of votes for 5 stars.Cain: My own personal star rating for the match.Meltz Gap: The magnitude of the difference between Meltzer and AVG.Meltzer: Dave Meltzer’s star rating for a given match.Q3: Third quartile, which is the value that roughly 75% of the votes fall at or below.Q2: Second quartile (aka median), which is the value that roughly 50% of the votes fall at or below.Q1: First quartile, which is the value that roughly 25% of the votes fall at or below. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |